| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
1. Why PC sucks, can it be fixed? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: 5/ The main cause for no incentive to fight, is there is usually a group who make it pointless to do so Not so long ago it was the Cap/RG/0H friendship ring.. as soon as that went, a new one took it's place via AE+FA So if CCP ad...
- by Dust User - at 2015.10.29 16:45:00
|
2. [Merc Contracts] Ringers - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You still doing this QQ ringer stuff? Personally, I would never use ringers anyways because #HONOR.
- by Dust User - at 2015.10.28 04:06:00
|
3. Group of gripes, nothing serious part 2 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Everyone always blames lag after getting REKT. It's never the poor planning or terrible FC that has no clue how to win a match.
- by Dust User - at 2015.07.20 15:54:00
|
4. District Timer Changes for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You are affiliated with Cyber Cobras so expect your days in PC to be limited anyways.
- by Dust User - at 2015.06.09 14:23:00
|
5. Sticky:[Data Insights] Simple Planetary Conquest Kill Analysis plus Raw... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nerfing heavies will not fix the main problem that causes heavy spam in the first place which is map design.
- by Dust User - at 2015.03.05 17:27:00
|
6. ccp read this. it will blow your mind for an idea. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Back to this again?
- by Dust User - at 2015.02.24 14:32:00
|
7. Sticky:[Update] Teambuilder logic - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: KEQ Thanks for the publicity. +1
- by Dust User - at 2015.02.17 09:01:00
|
8. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Roman837 wrote: trust me. I know. I am not concerned for my corp. Right now if this change is implemented. I will hold 4 districts. And not attack with them. Or attack friends for fun battles. I will dedicate our time to what we will call Raid...
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.24 19:18:00
|
9. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: 501st Headstrong wrote: ****Raiding***** Corporations with no districts should be able to be raided however for substantial LP, with a No-show stealing a large amount of the corps CP (Not enough for a recoup however. U...
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.23 22:39:00
|
10. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: I have already brought up to Rattati that randomizing the maps in rotation will be a very tough pill to swallow and not an affable outcome or even short term solution. Unless there's some reason why we can't, I think the ma...
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.23 21:57:00
|
11. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest Revisited - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zaria Min Deir wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Eh wording can be hard sometimes, I know I fail at it frequently. But yeah since basically....all of PC is Cargo Hubs now, I think randomizing them at the start is fine. Randomising the SIs to re...
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.23 19:35:00
|
12. PC map changes? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zaria Min Deir wrote: All I can say is... Rattati hadn't mentioned anything about randomising maps in any of the official feedback threads (afaik) until THIS thread popped up... So I'll know who to blame if we end up with some ridiculous rando...
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.23 18:16:00
|
13. PC map changes? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zaria Min Deir wrote: Dust User wrote: If maps are going to be random every time you attack/defend a district then we need some sort of intel displaying the map at time of attack/defend. This is crucial to pre-game squad building and tacti...
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.23 15:54:00
|
14. PC map changes? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: So battles on a huge planetary district always happen on the same exact 5x5 km area? I would call that nonsensical. All battles that happen in North America, are always in Central Park, NY. It would be interesting if you wo...
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.23 14:39:00
|
15. PC map changes? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: The maps are for "lore" reasons, does anyone object to randomizing this up a bit? I'm not against changing the maps up since we've been playing the same few for 2 years now. However, I don't want to see some of the larger...
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.22 12:27:00
|
16. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest - Timers - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Here's my opinion on the matter. My dust experience (if it matters) includes being in beta since June 2012 and participating in PC extensively since Day 1. I like the idea of timer windows +- X amount of hours each way. You set the timer yourse...
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.21 20:53:00
|
17. PC map changes? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I have seen no mention of changing the maps for PC districts. Is this in discussion?
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.21 19:25:00
|
18. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest - Timers - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
How about instead of limiting what times you can play there is some sort of penalty for multiple districts on same timer. CONCORD can tax the corp X amount of ISK for each additional district on a timer.
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.20 14:15:00
|
19. Sticky:[Feedback] Planetary Conquest - Rewards - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Why should anyone be rewarded for losing a battle? Also, I've been in PC matches where the other team brings MLT and STD gear and might kill 20 clones at best. Not sure this would accomplish much.
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.20 14:12:00
|
20. Thread under Construction (Second attempt) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: ^^ Seems like we've found someone that hates no shows worse than me. X) Interesting, I remember a time when you no showed many battles.
- by Dust User - at 2015.01.16 15:56:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |